SEARCH

Raimund Laqua (Ray) is a Professional Engineer (P.Eng.) and Project Management Professional (PMP) with Ray serves on ISO's ESG working group, OSPE's AI in Engineering committee, and as AI Chair for Engineers for the Profession (E4P), where he advocates for federal licensing of digital engineering disciplines

I chair the AI Committee at E4P (Engineers for the Profession) advocating for the recognition and right to practice for emerging engineering disciplines. As a profession we need to do more to elevate the role engineering across the multiple disciplines that are needed today such as AI engineering, Cybersecurity, Quantum and many others. As a professional engineer I recognize that I have a duty to uphold the public welfare as paramount and

governance policy means creating an operational, regulation framework that links  legal ,  ethical ,  engineering system behavior visible Compliance streams : Flows of promises from legal/ethical commitments through engineering Roles & Accountability Assign decision rights: executive sponsor, AI/Model Compliance lead, Engineering

As a Compliance Engineer, I'm focused on developing robust methodologies for emerging compliance challenges Requirements Isolation Strategy: A Systems Engineering Approach The webinar presented what I'll call systematically addresses uncertainty through: Methodical reduction of controllable risks, and Establishing engineering

Up until now, we have engineered machines to be deterministic, which means they are stable across time Artificial Intelligence - A Stochastic Wrench Yet, here we are, with a stochastic machine, a probabilistic engine

Professional engineers, for example, already adhere to strict ethical codes.

. - The Lean Compliance Engineer Uncertainty Creates the Opportunity for Risk I've sat through countless Quality engineers use FMEA to map uncertainties in manufacturing processes that create defect opportunities

As the European Defence Agency shows us, it's now a continuous journey involving rigorous engineering difference between Development and Runtime Assurance. ⚡️ Development Assurance: “Traditionally in system engineering

a result, the discussion has emerged as to whether the use of ChatGPT should lead to the loss of an engineering Professionals, especially those in highly regulated fields like engineering, bear a significant responsibility Speculating on the potential outcomes of engineers relying on ChatGPT in critical infrastructure systems specific incident raises concerns about the lawyer's reliance on AI-generated content, revoking an engineering relying solely on AI-generated content in the legal profession, contemplating the use of ChatGPT by engineers

I am a professional engineer who studied electrical / computer engineering back in the 80’s. As it turns out, compliance is not so different from engineering at least the way it is now. Compliance added a new benchmark – a new design objective for engineering. This requires thinking in engineering terms such as: Design Thinking, Systems Engineering, Model Based Engineering, Digital Twins and Threads, Risk-based Thinking, and so on.

typically follows a multi-step procedure which often bottlenecks during the design activities when engineers chart is an example of a process review using the 5M+E model looking into why there is a bottleneck in engineering

In my first year of engineering I was given this advice. You can be the smartest engineer but if you cannot articulate your ideas and communicate them then it Many engineers tend towards introversion (myself included) which means that learning to communicate requires