capability which serves as a defense against the effects of uncertainty in support of existing risk & compliance standards similar to quality, safety and environmental objectives or should it be added to existing risk & compliance

a familiar pathology: the safety manager has a title but not the authority to halt operations; the compliance

This documentation serves multiple purposes: regulatory compliance, quality assurance, and knowledge About the author: Raimund Laqua is a Professional Engineer, founder of Lean Compliance, co-founder of

Many companies apply linear thinking and steps when attempting to improve their risk and compliance systems following essential operational processes that work together as a whole to achieve, sustain, and advance compliance

If the manager didn't, no amount of policy, committee approval, or compliance documentation compensates

When it comes to risk & compliance no one wants to be surprised.

The Year Ahead As this year comes to a close, I want to thank all of you for being part of the Lean Compliance hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.’ – Thorin Oakenshield Merry Christmas from all us at Lean Compliance

It also helps you identify metrics to monitor and track the effectiveness of your overall compliance

stream mapping so that sources of process and information waste can be removed before addressing new compliance

Risk-based thinking is at the center of recent changes to compliance standards, guidelines, and regulations For the purpose of this article, the following compliance systems model (introduced in a previous article These risks may be introduced due to changes (shown in red in the above model) to: scope, critical to compliance

In terms of practice, compliance, and other categories of assessment there where no differences that excellent performance in the past there were other indicators that caused concern such as signs of complacency

Raimund Laqua, P.Eng is Founder of Lean Compliance, and Co-Founder of Professional Engineers.AI.