SEARCH

with legal and compliance teams to ensure AI use aligns with regulatory requirements Conduct regular audits

also limit their compliance efforts to reducing liability and avoiding prosecution by establishing audit Compliance is famously known for bottom line thinking focused on passing audits.

For compliance, establishing processes and building frames may help you pass an audit.

This is assurance-by-design which when done well decreases the need for excessive inspections and audits

In the past, audits functioned in a similar way as a compass did. Summary Compliance needs to move beyond using audits as the primary means to steer compliance.

Feed-forward Processes : In addition to feedback loops, cybernetics recognizes the importance of feed-forward Compliance Auditing and Assurance: Cybernetics enhances compliance auditing processes by automating compliance gaps, detect fraudulent activities, and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of compliance audits

obvious; they were too busy fighting fires, patching the next vulnerability, or closing gaps from their audits

implemented separately, what they do have in common is the same reactive strategy reinforced by an audit

compliance as a simple equation: identify requirements → implement controls → document everything → pass audits They're built around passing audits rather than achieving outcomes. In addition, the further you move from rules toward outcomes, the more you need to shift from documentation regulatory environment are those that: Take ownership of their obligations rather than just reacting to audits

The audit / fix cycle forms a negative feedback loop that uses corrective actions to adjust the system

I believe this will provide greater value to you than just passing an audit or achieving certification

environmental obligations from the perspective of their compliance approach and the shift from rules and audit-based