SEARCH

These capabilities are often directed at the reactive side of compliance focused on reporting, audits

Compliance often becomes a labyrinth of obligations, commitments, controls, audits, processes, and many Regularly audit your management program to identify and remove obligations (internal or external) that with existing compliance areas, consider modifying your current fulfillment systems to accommodate the additional

Organizations that want to take greater ownership of their obligations are finding the traditional audit In essence, compliance needs to be engineered rather than just audited. We need to engineer our compliance not just audit our conformance. We need Compliance Engineers.

While this element-first approach might achieve a certification or pass an audit quicker it seldom delivers

This new mindset would be closer to managing risks rather than managing audits. Instead of inspection and audits as the trigger for change, organizations would now be expected to set Compliance for many had focused on managing actions coming from audits rather than proactively preventing However, when it comes to compliance and such things as inspections and audits these are seen as waste prescriptive obligations and a focus on implementing "shall statements" in order to pass certifications and audits

A predominately reactive culture is one that has been reinforced by years of following an audit/fix cycle

ChatGPT about risk and compliance, I get the same old story—procedural compliance with its reactive, audit-focused

Consistency is a critical measure of performance and passing an audit is the measure of success.  

obligations such as adherence to standard operating procedures, controls, measurements, management review, audits In addition, compliance will also have performance obligations associated with goals and targets connected Corrective actions may arise from audits or inspections but also as part of system level monitoring.

But there is something else, something between the findings from the last audit and the preparations

Alongside benefits of Digital Twins, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) introduces additional Regular audits and evaluations of digital twin systems are essential to identify emerging risks and adapt In addition, collaboration between industry stakeholders, regulatory bodies, and technology developers

The visible compliance costs—$10,000+ per employee annually for training, audits, and regulatory activities—represent documents $10,000+ per employee annually in healthcare, financial services, and manufacturing for training, audits what Lean Compliance founder Raimund Laqua identifies as " The Reactive Uncertainty Trap "—waiting for audits