While you can verify that a product meets: quality, safety, and regulatory standards, it may not function

A system outcome is an emergent property that for compliance may be greater safety, quality, security

process improvement may end up exposing companies to: greater risk, loss of compliance, and reduced safety Thinking that provide a way to identify and manage undesirable effects: Those familiar with process safety MOC): Initiation Scoping Change Design Impact Analysis Approvals Implementation Pre-Startup Safety Close-Out In recent years, risk assessment and risk management have become more fully embedded in safety

When preventable incidents occur associated with safety, environmental, quality or regulatory objectives

compliance promises associated with quality of service, impact on the environment, worker and public safety

compliance program will have its own set of outcomes that it is trying to improve such as: reducing safety

compelled by laws, or pressured by stakeholders to improve compliance particularly with respect to safety

The goal was to improve public safety beyond what prescription could provide. now becomes the mandate for lean practitioners working in compliance domains including environmental, safety

In order to continually advance quality, safety, environmental and regulatory outcomes there are 4 changes

with common risk (i.e. strategic, operational, tactical) along with specific risks associated with safety

Companies must also meet multiple goals with regards to compliance whether they include: safety, security be ethical as stated in their mission and value statements where words such as: integrity, respect, safety There are areas such as safety where defensive skills are taught and reinforced. For example, safety involves making decisions that involve risk.

embedded systems interfacing with hardware, high-performance computing requiring deep optimization, safety-critical