SEARCH

Success Criteria : How you'll measure the effectiveness of your new compliance capabilities—not just audit

When companies consider compliance as a necessary evil they tend to use mostly inspections and audits

In the say way, compliance is not only about audits and enforcement.

They need to ensure processes are in place for ongoing monitoring, regular audits and assessments, and

to focus compliance mostly on conformance to rules attested by surveys and monitored by occasional audits

indicator from various sources such as performance reports, risk assessments, incident logs, and compliance audits

These systems are fundamentally reactive rather than proactive, concentrating on audits, compliance reporting

elements only include minimum procedural requirements that could be verified using an internal or external audit This measure of effectiveness will create additional requirements although not specified in API RP 1173

versus content behavior versus systems do it now versus do it later top down versus bottom up audit-fix

Quality Assurance in Compliance Traditional Approach (Quality Control): Audit findings Customer complaints

Here's what you need to do: Audit Your Lean Initiatives Who's on your transformation team?

In addition, the following activities are helpful to further manage risk: Clearly define roles and defeat can remain active Tag by-passed devices Monitor active defeats on a daily basis Conduct weekly audits