implemented separately, what they do have in common is the same reactive strategy reinforced by an audit

It's interesting that compliance focuses much of its attention on identifying, tracking, and auditing Unmatched obligations to promises may be a better indicator of future compliance performance than simply auditing

performance indicators and success metrics Stakeholder ownership and review processes Regulatory drivers and audit

Now, I am not saying management should now adopt a check-box or audit approach that is followed by traditional What we have learned since then is that inspection and audits seldom improve quality.

environmental obligations from the perspective of their compliance approach and the shift from rules and audit-based

organizations stay on top of their compliance obligations, ensuring that they are prepared for regulatory audits

This requires a new approach that aligns more with operational excellence than it does audit and reporting

So they act slowly, audit every step, as limiting as that might be, with hopes that everything and everyone

Integrate quality indicators into your compliance program: Incorporate them into your internal audits

There may be cases in which more is required – in which additional safety precautions tailored to fit And this begins with taking ownership for each obligation and not waiting for an audit or a fine for

Success Criteria : How you'll measure the effectiveness of your new compliance capabilities—not just audit

What we can be certain of is that reactive, check-box compliance focused on audits and action items will